Articles in this section

5-2008i - Managing Expiration/Supervision End Dates

Effective:  2008

Updated:  December 17, 2025

At Issue

Inconsistent practices make it difficult for receiving states to clearly understand the supervision term and their authority to supervise, including when a Compact supervision term ends. This includes the improper invalidation of case closure notices due to supervision extensions that were not timely communicated by the sending state, as well as the failure to use the ICOTS tolling feature in accordance with published guidance, resulting in inaccurate supervision end dates and confusion regarding ongoing Compact authority.

When Supervision End Dates May Be Updated

Supervision end date(s) must be updated when necessary to accurately reflect the supervision term as determined by the sending state, including when:

  • The supervision end date was entered incorrectly on the initial Transfer Request;

  • A court order, statutory amendment, or legislative change modifies the length of supervision; or

  • The sending state lawfully applies tolling to the supervision term, consistent with state law and sentencing authority, provided the supervision end date continues to reflect a future date for as long as the supervised individual remains subject to Compact oversight.

Changing the Supervision End Date

From the profile, 'compact cases' tab, users can locate the change feature.

SED1__2_.png

Click on the change hyperlink, update the “Supervision Ends On” field, and click submit to record the change.

SED2__2_.png

Notifying the Receiving State

Upon submission of the end date change, the sending state user should follow-up with a Compact Action Request regarding the date change to ensure the receiving state is aware of the reason for the change.

SED3__2_.png

 

Was this article helpful?
3 out of 3 found this helpful

Comments

0 comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.